59 Models →
Direct Head-to-Head Benchmark

OpenAI o3-mini vs DeepSeek R1 API Pricing & STEM Reasoning Benchmark (2026)

Compare OpenAI o3-mini ($1.10/$4.40) vs DeepSeek R1 ($0.55/$2.19): STEM math benchmarks, coding IQ, reasoning token multipliers, and latency trade-offs.

Candidate A

OpenAI o3-mini

$1.10 in / $4.40 out
Per 1M Tokens
VS
Candidate B

DeepSeek R1

$0.55 in / $2.19 out
Per 1M Tokens

Head-to-Head Monthly Cost Simulator

Simulate real workload expenditures for OpenAI o3-mini vs DeepSeek R1 at your expected token volume.

Monthly Input Tokens: 50,000,000
Monthly Output Tokens: 10,000,000
OpenAI o3-mini: $0.00
DeepSeek R1: $0.00
Difference: $0.00

Comprehensive Technical & Financial Breakdown

Side-by-side audit of pricing tiers, token speeds, benchmark intelligence, and architecture limits.

Specification / Metric OpenAI o3-mini DeepSeek R1 Financial & Engineering Impact
Input Price / 1M $1.10 $0.55 DeepSeek R1 is 50% cheaper
Output Price / 1M $4.40 $2.19 DeepSeek R1 is 50% cheaper
Cached Read / 1M $0.55 $0.14 DeepSeek R1 saves 75% on cache
Context Window 200,000 tokens 64,000 tokens o3-mini offers 3.1x larger context
Max Output Tokens 100,000 tokens 8,192 tokens o3-mini supports massive multi-file code synthesis
AIME 2024 Math 87.3% (High Effort) 79.8% o3-mini wins on Olympiad mathematics
SWE-bench Verified 49.3% 49.2% Statistical dead-heat on autonomous bug fixing
Time To First Token 1,400 ms 3,800 ms o3-mini is significantly faster for interactive UI
Reasoning Control reasoning_effort ('low', 'medium', 'high') Fixed CoT token generation o3-mini gives precise developer cost control
Engineering Architecture Verdict

Choose **OpenAI o3-mini** if you need low-latency interactive applications, fine-grained control via `reasoning_effort`, or large context (>64K tokens). Choose **DeepSeek R1** for high-volume offline batch evaluations, asynchronous pipelines, or where token unit economics are your #1 priority.

Frequently Asked Questions: OpenAI o3-mini vs DeepSeek R1

Real-world answers covering token budgeting, prompt caching, latency, and SLA differences.

Which model is cheaper for production coding pipelines?

DeepSeek R1 is approximately 50% cheaper on both input and output tokens ($0.55/$2.19 vs $1.10/$4.40). However, o3-mini with `reasoning_effort='low'` generates fewer reasoning tokens, which can narrow the net invoice difference.

How do reasoning tokens affect billing on both models?

On both models, internal reasoning tokens count as generated output tokens and are billed at full output rates. On o3-mini, reasoning tokens are hidden but billed; on DeepSeek R1, reasoning tokens appear in `` blocks and are billed at $2.19/M.

Does o3-mini support prompt caching?

Yes, OpenAI provides a 50% discount on prompt prefixes exceeding 1,024 tokens ($0.55/M). DeepSeek provides a 74% discount on cached reads ($0.14/M).

Can either model run locally?

DeepSeek R1 has open weights available under the MIT license, allowing self-hosting on 8x H100 clusters or quantized runs. OpenAI o3-mini is proprietary and accessible only via OpenAI or Azure API endpoints.