The battle for extreme inference speed. Groq pushes ~450 tokens/sec on Language Processing Units (LPUs). Cerebras pushes ~2,100 tokens/sec on Wafer-Scale chips. Which delivers the better unit economics?
| Metric | Groq | Cerebras | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens / Second (Output) | ~450 tok/sec | ~2,100 tok/sec | Cerebras (4.6x faster) |
| Input Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.59 | $0.60 | Roughly identical |
| Output Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.79 | $0.60 | Cerebras (24% cheaper output) |
| Time to Generate 1,000 Tokens | 2.22 seconds | 0.47 seconds | Cerebras (Sub-second) |
| Whisper STT Support | Yes ($0.0018/min) | No | Groq |
Standard GPUs (like NVIDIA H100) generate 80 to 140 tokens per second on 70B models. At that speed, running multi-agent debate (where 3 agents critique and rewrite code before presenting the solution to the user) takes 25 to 45 seconds, ruining interactive UX.
On Cerebras, an agent can generate 6,000 tokens of internal chain-of-thought exploration across three rounds in under 3 seconds! This transforms slow offline agentic workflows into instantaneous real-time UI interactions without incurring GPU rental infrastructure overhead.
/v1/chat/completions REST endpoints, allowing drop-in replacement by switching your baseURL and API key.